Research support for normative influence

Type: Strength
Study: Linkenbach and Perkins (2003)

  • Found adolescents exposed to the message ‘the majority of their age peers don’t smoke’ were less likely to begin smoking.
  • Shows people shape their behaviour to fit in due to desire.

Research support for informational influence

Type: Strength
Study: Wittenbrink and Henly (1996)

  • Found participants exposed to negative information about African Americans* later reported more negative beliefs about a black individual.
  • Suggests we are influenced by others when we believe they are more knowledgeable about an issue that we are.

* Thought the view represented the majority.

Informational influence is determined by type of task

Type: Limitation

  • When deciding on objective information, statistics can be used rather than others’ information to determine our own knowledge.
  • However when deciding on subjective issues, this cannot be applied and therefore we would accept information from others to decide.
  • Resulting in informational influence depending on the type of task and not explaining all instance of conformity.

Political opinions

Type: Strength
Study: Fein et al. (2007)

  • Prior research shows that judgements about politicians can be influenced by knowledge of others’ reactions.
  • Found judgements about presidential candidates in a debate were influenced by how others supposedly reacted towards them.
  • Suggests we are influenced by others when we believe they are more knowledgeable about an issue that we are.

Real-world application

Type: Strength
Study: Nolan et al. (2008)

  • Can be used to make people behave more responsibly.
  • Found that the behaviour of neighbours had the strongest impact on energy conservation behaviour.
  • Suggests normative influence plays an important role in promoting energy conservation behaviours.
    • Could be used in campaigns promoting energy conservation through demonstrating positive behaviours of the majority.